Whenever a litigator asks me to recommend useful iPad apps, one of my first recommendations is TranscriptPad. If you own an iPad and you work with depositions, you will love this app. And if you don’t have it yet, I encourage you to buy it immediately before the price goes up, as noted below.
First, a little background on what this app does. As I explained in my January 2012 review, TranscriptPad imports the text versions of depositions provided by a court reporter and organizes them into cases. [UPDATE: If you need to work with .ptx files, read the very helpful comments to this post that discuss strategies for doing so.] You can then use the app to read and annotate the deposition. And instead of simply marking all of the important stuff with a yellow highlighter (although you can do that too), TranscriptPad lets you add issue codes as you review a deposition. So if a Question and Answer are relevant to damages in a case, you can select those lines and apply the “Damages” issue code (or whatever other issue codes you want to create). When you are finished reviewing the deposition, the app creates a handy report organized by issue code so that you can, for example, see all of the key “Damages” testimony at one time, all of the key “Comparative Fault” testimony at one time, etc. I’ve used TranscriptPad extensively in my own practice for the last 18 months and the app has been very helpful for many of my cases.
Last night, the app was updated to version 1.6.9. Several new features were added, but by far the most important addition was a vast improvement to the reporting feature. The best addition is the ability to run a report across several transcripts. For example, if a deposition of a plaintiff is in three different volumes, you can now run a single report on all three volumes. Or even more useful, you can now run a report across an entire case. Thus, you can easily see the most important testimony of every single witness that was deposed on the issue of damages or comparative fault or whatever in a single report.
To run these new reports, first navigate to the level on which you want to run a report. In the following example, I have navigated to the top case level where I have all depositions in the case. In this example, I have depositions from Joe Plaintiff and Polly Plaintiff. Simply tap the Reports button at the bottom of the left column.

Tapping that button brings up the new and improved Report dialog box:

To prepare a report that shows you the actual transcript testimony (the report that I find most useful) select “Detail” type of report under PDF Reports on the left. You can then decide what to include in the report. By default, every annotation will be included and every issue code, but you can turn off particular types of annotations. For example, if you are only interested in Damages, you can just run a report on the issue code of damages.
Once your report is prepared, it is displayed on the right so that you can preview it.

If you like what you see, then tap the export button at the top right of the screen. That gives you the option to email the PDF report, print the document to an AirPrint printer, send the document to your Dropbox, or open the PDF file in another app. In the following example, I chose to open the file in iAnnotate PDF, another app that I am currently evaluating for an upcoming review. As you can see, the PDF reports are easy to read with the page and line numbers and the full testimony.

These reports are incredibly useful to me because with the passage of time, I often forget all of the important testimony from a deposition. A TranscriptPad report allows me to quickly see all of the key testimony in a case, organized by topic. After spending a few minutes reviewing a report, I am once again up-to-speed on what is good for my client (or sometimes, not so good) about the testimony of a witness.
Note that the text of the report is in black and white. If you chose to highlight or underline text (instead of applying an issue code) as you were reading, that is simply treated as another type of annotation. So just as you might have a report on the “Damages” issue code, the app creates a report of all testimony that you highlighted in yellow, all testimony that you underlined in blue, etc.
The Detail PDF Report is the most useful report for me, but you can create other types of reports. The Summary PDF Report will give you the page and line designations but not the actual testimony. The Annotated (Full) and Annotated (Mini) reports prepare a PDF version of the entire deposition with your annotations included. You can also create reports in .txt format (useful if you want to work with the file in Microsoft Word), Excel format, Sanction format and TrialDirector format.
The ability to create reports across several depositions is a key feature for me, but there are lots of other useful improvements in version 1.6.9. For example, you can now create a mini report with four transcript pages on each page, useful if you are printing out the annotated transcript and you want something that doesn’t take up much space in your briefcase. There are also improvements in the ways that issue codes are handled across a case, including the ability to hide issue codes that are not used in the particular deposition that you are reviewing. The full list of improvements in this update is as follows:
What’s New in Version 1.6.9
◆ New and updated report options, including new “Annotated (Mini)” report.
◆ Reports of Flags and Notes are now included in all reports, and can have unlimited text.
◆ Create reports at any level of your organizational structure: at the transcript level, the folder level, or even across a whole case.
◆ Highlights and Underlines can now be included in reports.
◆ Create report as an Excel file with Issue Codes, Flags, and other annotations in separate Sheets.
◆ Easily show/hide Issue Codes used in other transcripts, e.g. only have medical Issue Codes show in a doctor’s deposition.
◆ Added Copy Text option to Create Designation dialog, and pasted text will include the sources page and line information.
◆ Double-tapping a page/line designation jumps to that area of transcript and brings up the Create Designation dialog.
◆ Search field now also finds exhibit, file, and folder names, in addition to text in transcripts.
◆ Now supports 4 character page numbers for large depositions (current page indicator, page number on slider, page number in transcript, and search result hits).
◆ Added Recent button to allow you to easily and quickly jump back and forth between different transcripts.
◆ Enhanced transcript import to handle additional formatting scenarios.
◆ Rename dialog now updates immediately.
◆ Search results now sorted alphabetically.
◆ Renamed “Pack Case and Send” to more intuitive “Email Case”.
◆ Various minor bug fixes and improvements.
If you haven’t purchased TranscriptPad yet, I encourage you to do so today because the price is about to increase. Ever since the app was first released, it has cost $49.99, but because Apple doesn’t allow developers to charge for app updates, the developer told me that he is raising the price of the app to $89.99 to cover the future cost of development. I believe that the price increase will occur on Monday, July 29, 2013. Even $89.99 is a great price for useful litigation software, but if you don’t have TranscriptPad yet and you want to save $40, you have a few days left. Whatever price you pay, you’ll find that TranscriptPad transforms your iPad into a sophisticated tool for reading and annotating transcripts.
Update was released last night and you’ve already got a review up! Amazing. Also, thanks for the pricing tip; I’ve been thinking about buying this for awhile and now may take the plunge.
Thinking of this from my pocket book…
Unless I am missing something, but this doesn’t sound right. The developer is doubling the price to cover the future cost of development which would only be upgrades right? I looked at the prior version and this seems like only upgrades. This would put it in line with the other app from theirs which is one of the most expensive on the app store.
Wouldn’t they want to increase the price now? It seems they are losing money they are spending on development at a rate of 50% cost. If they charged $89 they could get their costs back faster.
Seems the developer has some extensive development costs.
Does anyone know what the new import formatting scenarios are? I’d be interested in purchasing if one of the options was PTX import.
The pricing increase makes sense to me. Those who bought “early” (in the first 18 months or so) before the future of the app is known pay a reduced price. Those who buy later, after the product has been enhanced with lots of additional features, pay a higher price. Legal software on the computer routinely costs hundreds of dollars, and if the software is good enough, I think that $100 is reasonable on the iPad. I know that developers are always trying to decide how to charge enough to get paid versus not charge too much to scare away purchasers, and I don’t have the business sense to know what the right price point is for every app, but I can tell you that this is a very useful app.
Being an accounting expert here…
What I am saying is something different. Shouldn’t the developer be charging the higher price now to help offset the costs of development because the future is now. It appears they already developed the new features and they were released yesterday and they are charging for them starting Monday.
My point is that shouldn’t they start now? My accounting education tells me that for every sell they make they are losing 50% off capturing their existing/future development costs.
Seems they are hurting themselves or maybe it is the iTunes App Store. I think Apple sticks it to developers anyway.
Anyway, to my other point do you know the import scenarios and if it allows for ptx import?
Thanks Jeff
J. — it imports the ASCII text file that you get from a court reporter. You cannot import .ptx because that is a proprietary format that Westlaw now owns. (Note that there is an app that can handle .ptx files on an iPad called Westlaw Case Notebook Portable E-Transcript; I reviewed it on 10-16-2012.) But if you get a .ptx file from a court reporter, you can use the free .ptx reader on a PC to export a text file that TranscriptPad can use. I’ve done that many times.
I will admit that I used to be a person who thought that an app like this needed .ptx support, but since it is so easy to do the conversion on a PC, there is really no need. Note, however, that if you use a Mac, I don’t think that there is a currently supported Mac program that can handle .ptx support, although I defer to the Mac attorney gurus on that. You might to use emulation software on a Mac. But if you use a PC in your office like I do, I suspect that you’ll find that .ptx import is really not a big deal.
The bigger problem I have is that sometimes I get a PDF version of a transcript that is just a scan of the paper version of a deposition. Those types of files are almost impossible to get into TranscriptPad. Sure, you can use OCR to scan it, but I don’t know of an easy way to create a standard text file that TranscriptPad can work with. If someone else knows of a solution I’d love to hear it, but when I need to annotate those files I just use the GoodReader app and highlight in yellow, which means I cannot take advantage of issue codes.
-Jeff
If you have a PTX file, and you are able to open and read it, you are probably using the free PTX viewer, on your PC. To convert that file to TXT you simply need to do the following: select File -> Save As -> Ascii… and choose Text File (*.txt) in the “Save as type:”, and Amicus in the “Transcript Style:” drop down list.
As for PDF files, I get a number of emails from users who have a transcript in PDF format that was provided by opposing counsel, or from an older case that they just became involved in, and they want to convert it to TXT to use in TranscriptPad. Although it is possible, I do not recommend trying to convert PDF files to TXT as some information can be lost in the conversion process, but it is possible in some situations. An important consideration is if the file is a normal PDF (like one provided by the court reporter where the text can be selected in Adobe Acrobat) or if it is an image PDF (a paper transcript that was scanned and saved as a PDF). A normal PDF will likely convert better than an image PDF that was then OCR’d to make the text selectable as the accuracy and formatting of the resulting OCR’d becomes a factor.
Having said that, some TranscriptPad users have had success using “A-PDF Text Extractor” software (freeware) to convert a normal PDF to TXT format. I tried it and found that it did convert some normal PDFs to TXT that imported well into TranscriptPad. Trying the same process with an image PDF that was OCR’d did not convert correctly. You can find it here: http://www.a-pdf.com/text/
Note that we cannot offer technical support for this software as we did not create it, and the TXT files it generates are not always 100% accurate.
Ian
support@litsoftware.com
Developers of TrialPad and TranscriptPad
Since we are on the topic of PTX files, none of the iPad or iPhone apps export to text file.
What I do is head to Clarity Legal and on their site you can load up a PTX file and have it converted to their CLT format which works on 3 platforms including their mobile version which is browser based. You can then export out to a text file if you want, that’s an easy workaround without having to use RealLegal’s junk
I hate PCs so I refused to use RealLegal’s product. So, that’s the workaround.
Apple users are covered both on the iPad and desktop with Clarity Legal’s and LitSoftware’s products. No reason for users not to switch.
Nathan