New iPad to be announced on March 7

Yesterday, Apple confirmed that the next iPad, which I presume will be called the iPad 3, will be announced at a press event at 10:00 Pacific on Wednesday, March 7 at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco, the same place that the original iPad was announced on January 27, 2010 and the iPad 2 was announced on March 2, 2011.  The invitation to the event says “We have something you really have to see.  And touch.”

The graphics that accompany invitations to Apple announcements always receive close scrutiny to determine whether they give anything away.  Here is the picture on the invitation that was sent around yesterday, as reported by Joshua Topolsky of The Verge:

Last September, the invitation for the iPhone 4S announcement said “Let’s talk iPhone,” which at the time I noted could include a double-meaning, not only that Apple would talk about the iPhone but also that the iPhone itself would talk with you.  Sure enough, the iPhone 4S added Siri. 

I suspect that the “something you really have to see” langauge on the invitation is a reference to a Retina Display screen, the biggest rumored feature of the next iPad.  I’ve also seen several people claim that the screen shown in the above graphic is much sharper than the current iPad screen (such as this post from Gizmodo).  Frankly, I do believe that the next iPad will have a Retina Display screen.  The iPad and iPad 2 have a 1024 x 768 pixel resolution at 132 pixels per inch (ppi).  My guess is that the next iPad will have a 2048 x 1536 resolution at 264 ppi.  (The iPhone 4 and 4S have a 960 x 640 pixel resolution at 326 ppi.)  While technically that means that the screen density would be even better on the iPhone than the new iPad, as a practical matter I expect it to look the same because you typically hold your iPhone a little closer to your face than the iPad.  Also consider that 2048 x 1536 is better than the resolution on your fancy 1080p HDTV (1920 x 1080), so if that is what Apple will be using, it will look amazing.

What else?  I’m sure that the new iPad will also have a faster processor.  New iPads and iPhones are always faster, plus it will need to have a much better processor to take advantage of the Retina Display screen.  There is also a rumor that the next iPad will support LTE 4G on cellular-equipped models.  I’d probably opt for a Wi-Fi only model anyway, but I would consider 4G on the iPad significant primarily because it would signal that the 2012 version of the iPhone would also have 4G when it is released, presumably later this year.  There is also a rumor of a better camera.  The only time I use my iPad 2 camera is for FaceTime, so while a better camera would be nice and is a logical feature to upgrade in a new model, it isn’t a big deal to me.  I really hope that the next iPad adds Siri, a feature that I love on my iPhone 4S and that I miss on my iPad 2.  Lex Friedman and Dan Moren of Macworld offer a good roundup of other rumored new features, while at the same time breaking the record for most puns in a Macworld article.

There are also rumors that Microsoft is planning to announce a version of Office for the iPad, and if this happens, perhaps it would also happen at the March 7 event.  And there are rumors of a new version of the Apple TV, presumably one that would add support for 1080p.

Time will tell which rumors are true, and I’m really looking forward to Apple’s announcement next week.

Reivew: Rulebook — browse, search and annotate court rules

Image 1 of 1There are lots of apps that allow you to carry court rules on an iPhone or iPad, making it difficult to choose just one.  One difference between apps is the content. Not many apps offer local rules and state rules, but it is common to see the major federal rules included such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Evidence.  Another big difference between these apps are the features.  The boring ones just display the rules; the better ones offer useful features to help you find the rule.  For example, most apps offer the ability to bookmark a rule, but what if you want the ability to further annotate a rule, such as highlight a rule or add a note in the margin, much like you might do with paper copy of the rules?  Rulebook is an app developed by Utah attorney Greg Hoole that offers this feature and more, and while content of the app is currently limited to a few jurisdictions, I'm very impressed by what this app can do.

The app itself is free, but then you need to download sets of rules.  Some sets, such as the Federal Rules of Evidence, are free.  Other sets cost $0.99 or $1.99.  Rules currently available include the major federal rules (Appellate, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure and Evidence) as well as state and local rules for California, New York, Texas and Utah.

Once you have installed a set of rules,  you can browse through the list of rules then tap a rule to view it.

Photo 1  Photo 2

You can search for terms across rules.  For example, in the Federal Rules of Evidence I decided to search for the hearsay rule for when a witness believes that he is about to die.  A search for "death" reveals every rule with the term.  Tap a rule to see each subpart of the rule with the word in it.  Note that you can search for a specific phrase, or you can enter a few possible search terms and show any matches of any words, useful if you are not sure of the exact word used.

Photo 3  Photo 4

You an tap on a subpart of a rule to see the term in the context of the entire rule.

Photo 5

To highlight or add notes, hold down on a block of text to select text, and then you can adjust the standard selection bars to select more or less text.  Then tell the app whether you want to highlight, add a note, or add a bookmark.  When you add a bookmark, you are not just bookmarking the entire rule as a whole, but instead the specific part of the rule that you selected, which is a great feature.  The second picture below shows a portion of the rule with both a note in the beginning (tap to read the note) and a portion of the rule highlighted.

Photo 6  Photo 7

An advertised feature of the app is that when the court updates the rules, the updates will soon afterwards be automatically delivered to the app, and your notes and highlighting will still stick around after an update.  No rules were updated while I was testing this app so I couldn't confirm this myself, but people who commented on Rulebook in the App Store say that the feature worked for them after the federal rules of civil procedure were updated last year.

There is also an interesting mutltiask mode, activated by tapping the icon with the two rectangles at the far right.  Tapping this button freezes the app at your current location and then lets you start what appears to be a new session of the app, much like multiple tabs in the Safari web browser.  You can then go search for another rule, but when you want to return to exact where you were before, tap that multitask button again to go back to the screen that you froze.  This is a very neat feature that I haven't seen in any other rule books, and Hoole tells me that he is seeking a patent on it.

Photo

You can swipe left or wipe to go from rule to rule in order, and you can double-tap on any subsection of a rule to quickly see the full specific cite to that section (e.g. Fed. R. Evid. 804(b)(2)) which is helpful for the times when you can see that you are in subsection "2" but don't want to have to scroll all the way up to see that you are under subsection "b" of the app.  This is another useful feature I haven't seen in other rule apps.

Photo

You can adjust the font and font size of the rules in the app, and if you don't like yellow as the highlight color, you can instead use blue, green or pink for all of your higlights.  (You cannot highlight in different colors at the same time.)

All of the above images come from the iPhone version, but the iPad version is similar except that it also works in landscape view, and in that view you can see the list of rules on the left with the specific rule on the right.  Any rules you purchase with one device can be downloaded to your other devices that use your same iTunes password.

Photo

Rulebook is an impressive app.  It includes all of the basic features that you would expect in any app containing the rules, plus it adds some useful features that I haven't seen elsewhere.  As someone who does not practice in California, New York, Texas or Utah, I wish that additional jurisdictions were offered, but the website for the app says that "many more" authorities are "coming soon" so I look forward to seeing future additions.  If you want to put court rules on your iPhone or iPad, you'll definitely want to take a look at Rulebook.

Click here to get Rulebook (free):  rulebook - Ready Reference Apps, LLC

Apple settles class action lawsuit re iPhone 4 antenna

I rarely pay much attention to lawsuits involving Apple on iPhone J.D. We all know it doesn’t take much more than a filing fee to initiate a lawsuit, so the fact that a lawsuit is filed against Apple is not an indication that Apple has done anything wrong, and lawsuits are often settled just because it is more efficient to resolve them that way versus paying to litigate and win a case in court. Nevertheless, after the iPhone 4 was released on June 24, 2010, there was a lot of discussion in the news about the unique antenna. By placing the antenna outside of the phone, there was more space inside of the phone which allowed the iPhone 4 to be both more powerful and thinner. Unfortunately, placing the antenna in that location had the potential to reduce the capabilities of the antenna depending upon a number of factors, such as how you hold the phone. The issue got enough attention that Apple finally held a press conference on July 16, 2010 to discuss how Apple developed and tested the iPhone 4 antenna and to announce that Apple would give out free iPhone 4 cases, such as the “Bumper” model sold by Apple, to any iPhone 4 customer who wanted one.

A number of lawsuits were filed alleging that the iPhone 4 antenna was defective. These cases were consolidated for multidistrict litigation (MDL) treatment before Judge Ronald M. Whyte of the Northern District of California in San Jose. In re Apple iPhone 4 Products Liability Litig., No. 5:10-MD-2188 (N.D. Cal.).

On February 10, 2012, Plaintiffs in the MDL lawsuit filed a notice that a settlement had been reached and attached a copy of a settlement agreement signed on January 24, 2012 by Jeff Rishner (Director, Litigation at Apple, Inc.), Apple’s outside counsel at Morrison, Forester, and counsel from five plaintiff law firms including Ira Rothken.

The terms of the settlement include the following. The class is defined as: “All United States residents who are or were the original owners of an iPhone 4.” (Apple employees, agents, etc. are excluded.) Apple is providing class members with two options. First, Apple will continue to provide free Bumpers until 18 months after it discontinues the iPhone 4. Second, Apple will provide class members with $15, but only if they certify in a claims form that (1) they experienced antenna problems with their iPhone 4, (2) they completed the troubleshooting steps on Apple’s website at www.apple.com/support/iphone/assistant/calls, (3) they “could not have returned their iPhone 4 without incurring any costs” and (4) there were unwilling to use a free bumper for the iPhone 4. Apple agrees to pay the cost of notifying class members of the settlement, including an e-mail to everyone in Apple’s warranty registration database and a quarter-page notice in USA Today and Macworld magazine. Apple also agrees to not oppose an award to Plaintiffs’ counsel for attorneys fees and costs of up to $5.9 million. Click here for a copy of the full settlement agreement.

On February 17, 2012, Judge Whyte granted conditional class action certification for the purposes of settlement and approved of the settlement. The deadline for opting out of the settlement is June 15, 2012 and a final fairness hearing is scheduled for July 13, 2012. Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the settlement administrator. The settlement website (which goes live on March 28, 2012) will be www.iPhone4settlement.com.

I continue to believe that this issue was overblown by the media. Every design feature involves tradeoffs, and I love the small size of the iPhone 4 that was made possible by the antenna design. I used to occasionally use an iPhone 4 Bumper, not because of the antenna but instead because it added some friction, and I gradually found myself using it less and less until I stopped using it altogether. Ever since I upgraded to the iPhone 4S with its similar antenna design, I haven’t found the need to use a Bumper for any purpose and I almost always carry around my iPhone 4S without any cover at all. I suspect that this could be one of those settlements where the plaintiff attorneys make more money than all of the class members combined, but it is good to finally put this issue to rest so that now we can do more important things, such as speculate about what will be in the iPad 3 and the iPhone 5.

In the news

This has been a big week for rumors, with more discussion of a possible iPad 3 introduction in less than two weeks and talk of the possibility that Microsoft will soon release a version of Office for the iPad. We’ll find out soon enough if there is anything to the rumors. In the meantime, here are the iPhone and iPad news items of note from the past week:

  • We now have three good options for legal research on the iPad: WestlawNext, Lexis Advance (which I reviewed yesterday) and Fastcase, a free alternative that I’ve long considered a must-have app for any attorney with an iPad. Fastcase was recently updated to add a Mobile Sync feature so that you can link the account you use on your computer with the iPad/iPhone account. Thus, you can save a document in one platform, and it will show up in the saved items list on other platforms
  • I use Chase bank, and I love the ability to deposit a check on my iPhone using the Chase app without having to go to a bank or ATM. Citibank has now added this great feature to its app.
  • Quickoffice, one of the best apps for viewing Microsoft Office files, was just updated to add Office 2010 support. I use this app all the time; my big gripe is that it doesn’t have support for footnotes or the ability to view track changes.
  • Ryan Faas of Cult of Mac discusses increasing support by IT departments of the consumerization of technology. In other words, employees are buying their own iPhones and iPads and looking to their iT departments to support them.
  • Tim Nudd of AdWeek discusses (and shows) every commercial that ever ran for the iPhone. I’ve always loved the first one, the “Hello” ad that ran during the Oscars in 2007.
  • Attorney Bill Latham of The Hytech Lawyer reviews 7Notes HD Premium, an app that converts handwriting to text.
  • Attorney Tom Mighell of the iPad4Lawyers site has an article in Law Practice Magazine about getting the most out of your iPad.
  • David Pogue of the New York Times reviews OnLive Desktop Plus, a way to run Microsoft Office and Internet Explorer on an iPad in a virtual environment. It’s an interesting app; I just started trying it out today and I’ll post a review soon.
  • A few days ago, ABC’s Nightline took a look at the factories that make iPhones and iPads. You can watch the video here on your computer; the program is not yet available in the ABC Player app for the iPad but I presume that it will be soon.
  • You know the noise that your iPhone or iPad makes when you slide to unlock it? John Brownlee of Cult of Mac reports that it is actually the click of a vice grip opening.
  • Horace Dediu of Asymco reports that Apple sold more iOS devices in 2011 than all of the Macs that it has ever sold in 28 years. Wow.
  • Rob Dean of WalkingOffice provides a tip for using the “Open In” feature to save legal opinions on an iPad.
  • And finally, for those of you who love personal protection as much as you love your iPhone, you’ll love the SmartGuard Pepper Spray iPhone case, available from Sabre Red for only $34.99: (via AppAdvice)

Review: Lexis Advance and Lexis Advance HD — legal research on the iPhone and iPad

Lexis Advance is a huge leap forward over the old Lexis.com research system. The simplified interface reduces most of the clutter that was always a problem for Lexis.com, and Google-like search features make it easier to find the case, statute, or other authority that you need. For many of the same reasons that WestlawNext is a big leap forward from the old Westlaw.com, Lexis Advance is much better than still-available-but-why-would-you-use-it-anymore Lexis.com.

WestlawNext has had an iPad app since 2010, and as I noted in my review last year, it is fantastic and it has received some great improvements since it was introduced.  Lexis recently released Lexis Advance for the iPad and iPhone. The apps themselves are free, but of course you must be a subscriber to Lexis Advance to use them. My law firm is, so I was able to try both apps.

When you start the iPad app, you are given a large search bar at the top. In the large panel below that, you can swipe between a (useless) Welcome page, a view of your saved folders and research or a history of prior research that you have done in Lexis Advance on either your computer, iPad or iPhone.

Select a content type (e.g. cases or statutes), a jurisdiction and/or a practice area (or leave any or all of them set to “all”) and then enter your search terms and tap search. This quickly brings up a search result screen. Cases are shown first, but you can tap on the word “Cases” in the bar on the left to select other sources. The large pane on the right shows you your search results. By default, cases are listed by relevance, but you can change the sort order such as court (highest/lowest), date, etc. Search terms do not seem to be displayed in this view.

Tap on a case name to bring up a case. A full case list is shown on the left to make it easy to jump to other cases. Search terms are highlighted in bold, and you can even jump to specific search words using the terms button at the bottom. You can make the left bar go away just by sliding it, and you can even make most all of the bars on the left and the top of the page go away by tapping the full page view button at the top left of the opinion.

 

Simply tap the Shepardize button to get full Shepard’s history, such as subsequent history and citing cases.

One of the features that I love in the WestlawNext app is the ability to highlight text. Unfortunately, you cannot do this in the Lexis Advance HD app. When you select text, your only options are to copy it to the standard iOS clipboard or you can save the selected text to a folder within Lexis Advance, but that feature seems fairly useless to me as you can only view a portion of the saved text.

Also curious is the gear at the top. It brings up something called “Settings” but it is not really settings at all, and instead just a way to get feedback, support, share the app, etc. There are no options to change any aspect of the app.

When you find a good case you can save it to a research folder on Lexis Advance so that you can easily access that case on your computer, or you can e-mail the case in PDF format. I don’t see any option to control the format of that PDF file, such as changing how search terms are highlighted or using an easier-to-read dual-column format. This is less of an issue for a statute, but is a very unfortunate omission for cases. Having said that, one of my biggest gripes with Lexis Advance on the computer is how difficult it is to change these same options; for example, even on the computer, there is no way to save dual-column format as a default so you must manually select it on the computer every single time. Arrgh.

In addition to the iPad app, Lexis also released a version of Lexis Advance for the iPhone. I cannot even begin to list all of the ways that this is an improvement over the prior, almost-useless Lexis Get Cases and Shepardize app for the iPhone released back in 2009. The Lexis Advance iPhone app works just like the iPad app, and now provides a great way to pull up a case, Shepardize it, and even perform real legal research on the iPhone, although you are of course somewhat limited by the small size of the screen.

These two apps are great for many of the same reasons that I love WestlawNext on the iPad. The interface is even more simple than Lexis Advance on the computer, and while this means that you lose some functionality, it also means that there are fewer barriers between you and your research. The Lexis Advance HD app on the iPad is so nice that I can honestly see myself using it even if I have easy access to a computer. The clean and focused interface seems to make it even faster to find good cases. I can’t see myself doing much true legal research on the iPhone, but since my iPhone is always with me, it is fantastic to have the ability to look up a case no matter where I am. In the past, I have used the Fastcase app on the iPhone to quickly find cases being cited by an opponent during oral argument. With the Lexis Advance iPhone app, I can not only read the case but I can also Shepardize the case to potentially find contrary authority.

The Lexis Advance app for the iPad doesn’t have all of the features of WestlawNext for the iPad.  Some of this may be because Lexis Advance on the iPad app is a 1.0 product whereas WestlawNext has been on the iPad for well over a year and has received improvements. Some of this has to do with the differences between the full versions of the products on the computer. But many attorneys don’t have a choice between WestlawNext and Lexis Advance because their office picks one system for everyone to use. There is no doubt that for any attorney who is a Lexis Advance user, the new iPad app is really impressive in its 1.0 version and I can’t wait to see it improved over time. Lexis has been doing some amazing things over the last few years, and the new Lexis Advance apps for iPhone and iPad embody all that is good about Lexis Advance and the future of Lexis.

Click here to get Lexis Advance for iPhone (free): Lexis® Advance - LexisNexis

Click here to get Lexis Advance HD for iPad (free): Lexis® Advance HD - LexisNexis

 

Review: CardMunch — scan business cards with your iPhone

[UPDATE 5/8/2014:  LinkedIn announced that it is discontinuing this app effective 7/11/2014, and that it is recommending that CardMuch users instead use Evernote.  Click here for more info.]

Last week, I reviewed ABBYY Business Card Reader, a $5 app that uses sophisticated OCR to read the names and numbers off of a business card so that you can create a contact entry without having to type all of that information by hand.  Florida attorney Katie Floyd of the great Mac Power Users podcast posted a comment on that post suggesting that I check out a similar app called CardMunch.  CardMunch also lets you scan business cards with your iPhone, but it takes a very different approach.

First, the app is free; the professional social network LinkedIn owns the app and gives it away.  More about this in a moment.

Second, as reported by Matt Lynley of Business Insider, the app doesn’t use optical character recognition (OCR) to read your business cards.  Instead, it uses a service owned by Amazon called Mechanical Turk, a service that hires real people to do simple, repetitive tasks.  The pay is low, but Mechanical Turk workers have very flexible hours and can work at home, so for many it is an easy way to supplement their income.  Because real people look at the image of the business card and then type the information, the accuracy of CardMunch is much higher than the OCR used by ABBYY Business Card Reader.

Here is an extreme example of how valuable this can be.  A while back, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak (who goes by “Woz”) gave me his business card, and it is unlike any other business card you’ve ever seen.  It is made out of stainless steel and is laser-cut.  I’ve heard it said that you could cut a steak with this business card, and I suppose that is possible.  When I tried to scan the card with ABBYY Business Card Reader, the app simply couldn’t recognize it.  No surprise; it is etched metal and difficult to read.  Even more curious, the phone number is presented in a format similar to a standardized test with numbers punched out on a grid.  However, when I scanned it with CardMunch, the Mechanical Turk worker was able to figure out that it was Steve Wozniak and sent me back an entry, although I see that even that person couldn’t figure out the 408-888-8888 phone number from the card.  (Note: I’m not giving out anything private here; Woz has advertised that number ever since he acquired it in the 1970s back when he used it as a dial-a-joke number.)

 

On the other hand, you need to have Internet access for CardMunch to read a card, and the scan process can take much longer.  In my tests it took about 15 minutes, but I’ve seen others post on the Internet that it sometimes takes several hours.  ABBYY Business Card Reader, by comparison, can read a card in few seconds.  Having said that, the CardMunch app doesn’t make you wait.  Just scan one or more cards and let the app send off the images.  You can then return to the app minutes or hours later and you will notified if you have new contact entries that have been processed.

Third, because the app is owned by LinkedIn, the app (or perhaps more accurately, the Mechanical Turk employee) will try to match the business card with a resume on LinkedIn.  If CardMunch finds a LinkedIn entry, your contact will contain information from the person’s LinkedIn profile.  For example, you can see in that scan of the Woz business card that it provides me with information not on the card itself, such as the fact that he is a Fellow at Apple, his photograph, etc.  It is a little strange — some might say creepy? — to scan a simple business card and get back a contact entry that includes additional information such as a photograph of the person, employment history, schools attended, etc.  On the other hand, this is all public information that the person has decided to put on LinkedIn, so you shouldn’t feel too voyeuristic, and it can quite be useful to have all of this information regarding the person who just handed you a busines card.

Herr is the result from scanning my own card, which led to results from my own LinkedIn profile plus phone numbers from my card.  I’m not sure why the Mechanical Turk worker who read my own business card called the main number at my office my “home” number; it is clearly labled “Main” on the card itself.

If the person cannot be found on LinkedIn, then you just get back a simple contact entry that only contains the information from the card that the Mechanical Turk worker was able to read.

CardMunch doesn’t have some of the advanced features of ABBY Business Card Holder such as the ability to sort by different attibutes and the ability to assign groups to different contacts.  On the other hand, just like the ABBYY app, CardMunch does give you the option of keeping the contact in the app itself and/or sending the contact information to your iPhone’s Contacts.

Note that when you share from CardMunch to the main Contacts app you don’t get all of the LinkedIn information such as the profile photograph, website, biographical information, etc.; it appears that the app only share the information taken from the card itself.

Katie Floyd warned me about checking out the Settings app on the iPhone and then scrolling down to the entry for CardMunch.  There is an option called “Auto Connect” and if you have it turned on, every time the app scans a business card of someone who has a profile on LinkedIn, it automatically sends a request to become a LinkedIn Connection.  You might not want to become a connection of the guy trying to sell you life insurance who just handed you a business card, so make sure that this is turned off if you don’t want to use the feature.  (For me, it was turned off by default.)

I am torn on whether to recommend ABBY Business Card Reader or CardMunch.  I suppose that it is nice that CardMunch is free versus the $5 for the ABBYY app, but when an app is free that just makes me wonder what else they are doing to make money off of me.  What does LinkedIn do with the information on the business cards that are scanned?  I don’t know the answer, and frankly I’m trying to decide how much I even care.  It’s not like I often receive business cards from private celebrities or political disidents who are trusting me to keep their contact information confidential from a third party liked LinkedIn, but I can’t help but wonder about this.

As for the use of Mechanical Turk and the use of LinkedIn profiles, there are clear advantages to getting scan results that are not only more accurate, but in many cases even more complete than the information on the card itself.  On the other hand, if speed is important, you’ll want an app like the one from ABBYY that performs the OCR itself in a matter of seconds. 

There are other apps in the App Store that let you scan and handle business cards with the iPhone and I don’t plan to do an exhaustive review of all of them.  Nevertheless, the approach taken by CardMunch is so different from the ABBYY apps that I reviewed last week that I thought it would be interesting to compare and contrast them.  Whichever app you choose, you’ll save yourself a lot of time and hassle entering contact information manually, and you have the helpful ability to decide whether you want the contact to remain in the app or be moved to your main Contacts database.

Click here for CardMunch (free):  CardMunch - Business Card Reader by LinkedIn - LinkedIn Corporation

Click here to get ABBYY Business Card Reader ($4.99):  ABBYY Business Card Reader - ABBYY

Click here to get ABBYY CardHolder ($2.99):  ABBYY CardHolder - ABBYY

In the news

As I’ve mentioned in the past, I’m now writing a monthly column for the TechnoLawyer BigLaw newsletter.  In this week’s issue, I wrote about key iPhone apps that law firms should encourage their lawyers to use and the ways that law firms can purchase apps for their lawyers, including using Apple’s Volume Purchasing Program.  If you don’t subscribe to the BigLaw newsletter yet, I encourage you to do so.  Click here to sign up for a free subscription to BigLaw.  And now, the news of the week:

  • If you use FileMaker as your database program, check out this article for TidBITS by Steve McCabe about the FileMaker Go app for the iPhone and iPad.
  • Portland, Oregon attorney Josh Barrett of TabletLegal reviews OfficeTime, a time and expense app for lawyers.
  • I recently reviewed TranscriptPad, an iPad app that is great for reviewing deposition transcripts.  Yesterday, Josh Barrett posted this interesting interview with Ian O’Flaherty, the developer of the app.
  • AppleInsider notes that Apple made $1 out of every $5 spent on consumer electronics in the U.S. this past holiday season.
  • New York attorneys Katherine Helm and Joel Cohen discuss the risks of taking your electronic devices to other countries in this article for Law.com.
  • Attorney Tom Mighell of the iPad4Lawyers site compares OnLive Desktop and CloudOn, two options for running Microsoft Word on the iPad.
  • Boston Attorney Martha Sperry reviews Remarks, a PDF annotation app for the iPad, on her Advocate’s Studio blog.
  • Kelly Hodgkins of TUAW reviews the 2.0 version of Tweetbot.  Because of Tweetbot’s great new features such as inline viewing of images and Readabiilty integration, it is now my favorite Twitter client for both the iPhone and iPad.  I had been using Twitterific.
  • David Pogue of the New York Times discusses the next version of the Mac operating system, OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, which incoporates many concepts from the iPhone/iPad into the Mac and adds better compatability between the iPhone/iPad and the Mac such as a Messages client.
  • Alan of Art of the iPhone analyzes whether AppleCare+ for the iPhone is worth it.
  • Ron Johnson had been the head of Apple’s successful retail stores.  A few months ago, he left Apple to become the CEO of J.C. Penny and he is working to turn that company around.  Johnson recently appeared on CBS This Morning.  The interview begins with him talking about hiring Ellen DeGeneres as a new spokesperson, a decision in the news because it was opposed by a few homophobic protestors, but he also discusses his time at Apple and what he learned from Steve Jobs that he is bringing to J.C. Penny.  The video is embedded in this MacNN article, as is a funny clip from DeGeneres.
  • iDownloadBlog has the winners of the 2011 Original iPhone Film Festival.
  • And finally, at the recent Grammy Awards, Eddy Cue, Apple’s senior vice president of Internet Software and Services, accepted a Grammy on behalf of Steve Jobs for his contribution to music.  Here is Cue’s short acceptance speech:

Apple CEO Tim Cooks talks about the iPhone, iPad and Apple

Yesterday, Apple CEO Tim Cook gave a presentation at the Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference. It isn’t often that we see an extensive interview with an Apple CEO, and this presentation was particularly interesting.  You can currently listen to an audio recording if you want to hear it all, but there were five parts of his presentation that I thought would be of particular interest to iPhone J.D. readers, and thus I transcribed what Tim Cook said that so that you could simply read it.  The topics that I included below include (1) the working conditions at the Chinese factories where iPhones and iPads ar assembled, (2) the future of the iPhone, (3) the future of the iPad, (4) the future of iCloud and Siri and (5) Tim Cook’s general plans for Apple.

The following headings in bold are mine, but the words that follow are pretty much exactly what Tim Cook said, although I omitted some “umms” and the like, and I may have made some minor errors as I quickly typed this up.  I also left out the questions because I think that Tim Cook’s answers stand on their own.  Hopefully you will find what Tim Cook said as interesting as I did.

Working conditions for Chinese workers who assemble Apple products

The first thing that I would want everyone to know is that Apple takes working conditions very, very seriously, and we have for a very long time.  Whether workers are in Europe or in Asia or in the United States, we care about every worker.  I spent a lot of time in factories personally, and not just as an executive.  I worked at a paper mill in Alabama, at an aluminum plant in Virginia.  Many of our top managers and executives visit factories on a regular basis, and with hundreds of employees who are based there full time.  So we are very closely connected with the production process, and we understand working conditions at a very granular level.

I realize that the supply chain is complex.  And I’m sure that you realize this.  And the issues surrounding it can be complex.  But our commitment is very very simple.  We believe that every worker has the right to a fair and safe work environment, free of discrimination, where they can earn competitive wages and they can voice their concerns freely.  Apple suppliers must live up to this to do business with Apple.

We also believe that education is the great equalizer, and that if people are provided the skills and knowledge that they can improve their lives. We put a lot of effort into providing education resources to workers throughout our supply chain.  We provide free classes in many of the locations in our supply chain.  And we partner with local colleges to provide courses like English and Entrepreneurship and Computer Skills and the like.  More than 60,000 employees have attended these classes, which is pretty amazing when you think about it.  If you could take all of these employees and move them to one location, it would be a campus population larger than Arizona State, which is the largest public university in the United States.  Many of these workers go on to earn an associates degree.  And so this is a very powerful stepping stone for people looking to advance their careers and their lives.

In terms of problems that we are working to fix, you can read the details on our website, but I would tell you that no one in our industry is doing more to improve working conditions than Apple.  We are constantly auditing facilities, going deep into the supply chain, looking for problems, finding problems and fixing problems.  And we report everything because we believe that transparency is so very important in this area.

I am so incredibly proud of the work that our teams are doing in this area.  They focus on the most difficult problems, and they stay with them until they fix them.  They are truly a model for the industry.

Let me give you some examples, because I think this is so important and so topical.  And both from large to small. 

We think the use of underage labor is abhorrent.  It’s extremely rare in our supply chain, but our top priority is to eliminate it totally.  We’ve done that with our final assembly vendors and are now working down into the supply chain.  If we find a supplier that intentionally hires underage labor, it’s a firing offense. 

We don’t let anyone cut corners on safety.  If there’s a production process that can be made safer, we seek out the foremost authorities in the world, the foremost experts, and cut in a new standard, and then take that and we apply that to the entire supply chain.  We focus on the details.  If there is a fire extinguisher missing from the cafeteria kitchen, then that facility doesn’t pass inspection until that fire extinguisher is replaced.

We’re continuing to focus on the problems that are endemic to our industry like excessive overtime.  Our Code of Conduct has a cap of 60 hours for a work week, but we’ve consistently found violations to this code over the course of our time.  So at the beginning of this year, we announced that we’re determined to drive widespread change, and we’ve begun to manage working hours at a very micro basis.  As an example, in January, we collected weekly data on over a half a million workers in our supply chain, and we had 84% compliance.  Now this is significantly improved from the past, but we can do better.  And we’re taking the unprecedented step of reporting this monthly on our website so that it’s transparent to everyone what we’re doing. 

Now as you probably know, the Fair Labor Association began a major audit of our final assembly vendors at our request.  We started working with the FLA last year on an auditing project, and just in January we were the first technology company ever admitted into their association.  The audit that they’re conducting is probably the most detailed factory audit in the history of mass manufacturing in scale, in scope and in transparency.  And I am looking forward to seeing the results. 

We know that people have a very high expectation of Apple.  We have an even higher expectation of ourselves.  Our customers expect us to lead, and we will continue to do so.  We are blessed to have the smartest and most innovative people on Earth.  And we put the same kind of effort and energy into supplier responsibility as we do with our new products.  That is what Apple is all about.

Apple’s last fiscal quarter and opportunities for iPhone growth

37 million [iPhones sold from from September 25, 2011 to December 31, 2011] is a big number.  It was a decent quarter.  [audience laughs]  It was 17 million more than we had ever done before.  And so we were pretty happy with that.  But, let me give you a different, at least the way that I look at the numbers, which is maybe a little differently than you do.  As I see it, that 37 million for last quarter represented 27% of the smartphone market.  So there’s three out of four people who bought something else.  And it represented less than 9% of the handset market, so nine out of ten people are buying something else.  The smartphone market last year was half a million units.  In 2015 it’s projected to be a billion units.  The handset market is projected to go from 1.5 to 2 billion units.  And so when you take it in the context of these numbers, the truth is this is a jaw-dropping industry.  It has enormous opportunity to it. 

And so, up against those, the numbers don’t seem so large anymore.  What seems large to me is the opportunity.  And so what we’re focusing on is the same thing that we’ve always focused on, which is making the world’s best product.  We think that if we stay laser focused on that, and continue to develop the ecosystem around the iPhone, that we have a pretty good opportunity to take advantage of this enormous market.

iPads

This 55 million [iPads sold to date since they started shipping in April of 2000] is something nobody would have guessed, including us.  To put it in context, it took us 22 years to sell 55 million Macs.  It took us about 5 years to sell 22 million iPods.  It took us about 3 years to sell that many iPhones.  And so this thing is, as you said, it’s on a trajectory that’s off the charts.  And so why is this?

Well, the product is absolutely incredible, and the pace of innovation on the product has been incredible, and so we’ve gone from iPad 1 to iPad 2 in fairly short order.  And the ecosystem that developers have helped us build out is about 170,000 apps that are optimized for iPad.  And so this is incredible. But the reason that it’s so large, in my view, is that, one, the iPad has stood on the shoulders of everything that came before it.  And so the iTunes Store was already in play.  The App Store was already in play.  People were trained on iPhone, and so they already knew about multitouch.  And so there were lots of things that became so intuitive when someone began to use a tablet, that, I mean, literally … I gave one to my mother and she knew how to use it like this from just watching the commercial.  And so, it’s amazing how the product has captured so many different people.  You’re using one.  My mother’s using one.  My seven year old nephew uses one.  I go to the gym in the morning, the trainer’s using one.  At Starbucks, I look around, everybody has one reading their newspaper or whatever.  In education, it’s being used.  In the enterprise, it’s being used in big numbers.  So, from my point of view, it’s the fastest adoption across a wide range that I’ve ever seen before.

… We started, obviously, at Apple using the iPad well before it was launched.  Of course, we had our shades pulled and everything so nobody could see us.  But what I started noticing about my own personal behavior is that it quickly became 80% to 90% of my consumption and work was done on the iPad.  And so honestly, from the first day it shipped, we thought, and not just me, many of us thought at Apple, that the tablet market would become larger than the PC market and it was just a matter of the time that it took to occur.  And I feel that stronger today than I did then.  Because as I look out, I see all of these incredible usages for it, and I see the incredible rate and pace of innovation in the developers. 

If we had a meeting today at this hotel and we invited everybody who is working on the coolest PC apps to come to the meeting, you might not finding anyone at the meeting.  If you did that same thing for iOS or that other operating system and you said everyone come who is working on this, you couldn’t get everybody in this hotel.  You’d have somebody covering every square inch here.  That’s where the innovation is.  That doesn’t mean that the PC is going to die.  I love the Mac.  And the Mac is still growing and I think it can still grow.  But I strongly believe that the tablet market will surpass the unit sales of the PC market and it’s just a matter of the rate and speed and time that that happens.  It’s too much of a profound change in things not to, I think.

iPad competitors

Price is rarely the most important thing.  A cheap product might sell some units, and somebody may get it home, and you know they feel great when they pay from their wallet the money, and then they get it home and use it, and the joy is gone, and the joy is gone every day that they use it, and they wind up not using it anymore.  And so you don’t keep remembering “oh I got a good deal” because you hate it.  And so what happened last year is that everybody who was in the PC industry and everybody who was in the phone industry, everybody decided that they had to do a tablet.  And so by some estimates there were 100 tablets put on the market last year.  And everybody was kind of aiming at iPad 1, and we were trying to innovate quickly to get to iPad 2, and so by the time they had something that they thought could compete with iPad 1, we were on iPad 2, and you know we would up with 170,000 apps and I’m not sure there is 100 apps on the other platform.  And so I think people at the end of the day, they want the great product.

Amazon is a different kind of competitor.  They’re different, they have different strengths, and so forth.  And I think they’ll sell a lot of units.  I think they have and they will.  But I think that the customers that we’re designing our products for are not going to be satisfied with a limited function kind of product.  And I think that the real catalyst to the tablet market will be innovation and pushing the next frontier.  And so, honestly, we’ll compete with everybody.  I love competition.  And so long as people invent their own stuff, I love competition.

The future of iCloud and Siri

Siri and iCloud are profound.  If you take iCloud, and if you dial back 10 years, 12 years, Steve announced a strategy for Apple that positioned the Mac or PC as the hub of someone’s digital life.  And out of that Apple developed a whole suite of apps called iLife, and you could connect many gadgets off of this and sync all of your music or photos.  You could edit your photos, you could edit movies, and so forth.  But the idea was that the PC or Mac was the repository. 

iCloud turns that on its head because it recognizes that across that decade, particularly the last two or three years, you and I live off of multiple devices.  It’s no longer a great customer experience to have to sync your iPad to your Mac, and then your iPhone to your Mac, and then resync your iPad because there was something on your iPhone, you know this is a hair-pulling exercise.  iCloud recognizes the Mac or PC as another device.  All of a sudden, your life has just gotten so much easier.  We now have a hundred million users of iCloud.  We just launched it in October.  A hundred million.  I mean, this is unbelievable.  And there is obviously more that we can do with it.  I view iCloud as not something with a year or two product life, but it’s a strategy for the next decade or more.  So I think it’s truly profound.

Siri.  For years, if you were a PC or Mac user, you used a physical keyboard and you used a mouse for input.  And you pretty much did that for a long, long time.  And there wasn’t a great deal of, there was evolution in the space but not a great deal of revolution.  And then all of a sudden Apple comes out with multitouch on the Macbook Pros, and this was really cool.  And then extended that into phones and tablets, so this has completely changed those industries in total.  Siri is another profound change in input.  And it is something that we’ve always dreamed of.  I think all of us wanted this to work.  It’s sort of like having a video call with FaceTime and it’s like “Aha, this can work.”  And Siri, it’s hard to imagine that it’s just a beta product.  I’ve never felt I couldn’t live without a beta product before, but now I feel I can’t live without one. 

I think that these two are both profound.  They are not things where we run separate [profit and losses] on.  Because we don’t do that, we don’t believe in that.  We manage the company at the top and just have one P&L and don’t worry about the iCloud team making money and the Siri team making money.  We want to have a great customer experience, and we think measuring all of these things at that level would never achieve such a thing.  But I do think that both of these go in the “profound” category.  They’re not these things that will not mean anything a year or two from now.  They are things that you’ll look back at, that you’ll talk to your grandkids about, that were profound changes.

The future of Apple under Tim Cook

Apple is this unique company, unique culture, that you can’t replicate.  I’m not going to witness or permit the slow undoing of it.  Because I believe in it so deeply.  Steve grilled in all of us over many years that the company should revolve around great products.  We should stay extremely focused on a few things rather than try to do so many that we did nothing well.  And that we should only go into markets where we could make a significant contribution to society, not just sell a lot of products in a market.

These things, along with keeping excellence and an expectation of everything in Apple, these are the things that I focus on.  I think that those are the things that make Apple a magical place that really smart people want to work in and sort of do not just their life’s work but their life’s best work.  There’s no better thrill than to look out at an audience, I can’t see anything with these lights, but look out at an audience and see people using iPhones, or go to the gym and see people using iPods, or go to Starbucks and seeing people use the iPad, these are the things that bring a smile to my face.  There’s no replacement, no substitute for that.  We’re always focused on the future.  We don’t sit and think about how great things were yesterday.  I love that trait because I think it’s the thing that drives us all forward.

Those are the things I’m holding onto, and it’s a privilege to be a part of it.

Review: ABBYY Business Card Reader and ABBYY CardHolder — scan business cards with your iPhone

Thanks to the iPhone and iPad, I’ve managed to keep much of my law practice paperless.  There are still times when paper is more convenient, but the last thing that I want in my life is unnecessary paper … and business cards tend to fall into that category.  Some business cards are from people who I want to add to the Contacts on my iPhone/iPad, so I’ll want to take the time to enter all of the information from the card by hand.  More often, I get business cards from people who I don’t really want to add to my Contacts, such as vendors, but it is useful to keep the contact information someplace just to remember that I met them in case I do need to contact them in the future.  ABBYY Business Card Reader is a $4.99 app that does what you would guess from the name; it takes a picture of a business card, performs optical character recognition to read the text on the business card without you having to manually type it all in, smartly determines the fields applicable to the text (name, phone number, e-mail address, etc.) and then saves the information in a contact entry.  The app then lets you send that information to your main Contacts database, or you can just save it within the app itself.  ABBYY CardHolder costs $2.99 and lacks some features such as the ability to send the information to the Contacts database on your iPhone, but you can add those features by paying an additional $1.99 as an in-app purchase.  There are some minor cosmetic differences, but I don’t see any substantive differences between paying $4.99 for Business Card Reader and paying $2.99 + $1.99 for CardHolder.

ABBYY was founded in 1989 by David Yang, Ph.D.  Wikipedia says that he is “ranked among the most famous Russian IT-entrepreneurs.”   ABBYY is based in Moscow but has offices around the world and over 1,000 employees.  It has long-produced PC software to convert images and PDF files into editable and searchable files, and the company is now applying that same technology to an iPhone app.  The company sent me a free review copy of ABBY Business Card Reader and ABBYY CardHolder, and I paid for the in-app upgrade to compare the two apps. 

You start by taking a picture of the business card.  The app then scans the business card to read the text and identify which field best applies to the text.  The optical character recognition (OCR) process just takes a few seconds.

 

Next the apps shows you a contact entry with the information from the OCR in the fields that the app considers appropriate.  A few times the app was 100% perfect.  Most of the time the app made some small errors in the OCR process, but when the app knows that it is guessing it highlights the suspect letters in red so it is easy to find the mistakes and fix them.  If there are too many mistakes, you can just scan the card again; when I did so, I always saw different results.  For example, in this first example the app that that my e-mail address was my company name; in the second example, the app correctly figured out that Adams and Reese was my company name, but it inserted a mistake period in the last word.  Importantly, however, the app tends to do a really good job with getting numbers correct, which is very helpful considering how tedious it can be to add a bunch of numbers by hand.

 

Once you have edited the contact entry to fix any mistakes from the OCR process or the assignment of fields, the app with either add the contact to the in-app list of contacts, or, if you are using Business Card Reader or if you paid to upgrade CardReader, the app can send the contact information to your main Contacts app (or do both).  If you have another entry with the same name, you are given the option to merge the information.

For contact in the app, the app provides you a list of entries that you can sort by first name, last name, company or date added.  If you tap on a contact, you then see a picture of the card with buttons at the bottom that you can tap to call any of the phone numbers, e-mail any of the e-mail addresses, send a text message, see a website in Safari. In Business Card Reader and in the upgraded version of Card Reader, you can also tap to see the address on a map.  You can also tap the pencil icon in the bottom corner to edit the entry.  You can also send an entry as a .vcf file attached to an e-mail or in a text message.  Except for the sort features, these are all features that you can already do with the main iPhone Contacts app, so while it is nice that the app does this too, there is nothing revolutionary here.

 

The app has lots settings that you can adjust.  You can turn a flash on or off, decide whether to save each picture that you take to your camera roll, create different groups that you can apply to contacts in the app, and edit the contact fields.  And as a reminder that ABBYY is an international company, you can select up to 22 languages to use when performing OCR.

The Business Card Reader app worked very well for me.  In my tests of CardReader I ran into a few quirks, such as the app occasionally freezing up while performing the OCR process.  (If this happens to you, force the app to quit and then launch the app again.)

I love having the ability to save a business card to the app itself and not add it to my full Contacts, great for those times when someone gives you a business card but you are unsure whether you will ever need it again but don’t want to worry about keeping track of the card just in case you do.  Having said that, I think that most attorneys who use this app will also want to have the ability to send information to the main Contacts database.  For that reason, I recommend that you just purchase the $4.99 version at the outset.  It has this main screen when you start the app with a big button to press to take a picture and another big button to press to see your in-app contacts, whereas the CardHolder version always just takes you to the list of contacts and you have to tap a tiny button in the top right to take a picture of a card.

But as noted, the differences between the two apps are mostly just cosmetic, so if you are a cautious spender you can get the $2.99 version today and then check out the app before you spend the extra $1.99 for the full features.

ABBYY Business Card Reader and ABBYY CardHolder are useful apps for anyone who receives business cards.  The OCR process makes it much faster to enter the information from a business card, and I love that you can choose whether you save the information in the app or you add it to your main Contacts database.

Click here to get ABBYY Business Card Reader ($4.99):  ABBYY Business Card Reader - ABBYY

Click here to get ABBYY CardHolder ($2.99):  ABBYY CardHolder - ABBYY